Eswatini vs Libya: Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per unit of GDP
Eswatini
0 tonnes per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Libya
0 tonnes per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Eswatini rank
82nd
Libya rank
82nd
Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per unit of GDP over time
- Eswatini
- Libya
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP against 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP in Libya, a difference of 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Libya ahead.
Eswatini ranks 82nd and Libya ranks 82nd of 188 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per unit of gdp, Eswatini or Libya?
- Eswatini, at 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP against 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per unit of gdp between Eswatini and Libya?
- 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Libya?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Libya rank globally for soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per unit of gdp?
- Eswatini ranks 82nd and Libya ranks 82nd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel? divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.