Hong Kong vs South Korea: Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre

Hong Kong
16.19 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
South Korea
3.17 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong rank
2nd
South Korea rank
3rd

Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre over time

  • Hong Kong
  • South Korea
0510152025196119922023

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 16.19 tonnes per square kilometre against 3.17 tonnes per square kilometre in South Korea, a difference of 13.02 tonnes per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 5.1 times South Korea's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong ranks 2nd and South Korea ranks 3rd of 189 countries.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong South Korea Difference Ahead
1960s 11.11 tonnes per square kilometre 1.76 tonnes per square kilometre 9.35 tonnes per square kilometre Hong Kong
1970s 14.93 tonnes per square kilometre 3.06 tonnes per square kilometre 11.87 tonnes per square kilometre Hong Kong
1980s 18.94 tonnes per square kilometre 3.91 tonnes per square kilometre 15.03 tonnes per square kilometre Hong Kong
1990s 16.98 tonnes per square kilometre 3.5 tonnes per square kilometre 13.47 tonnes per square kilometre Hong Kong
2000s 19.05 tonnes per square kilometre 3.74 tonnes per square kilometre 15.3 tonnes per square kilometre Hong Kong
2010s 18.76 tonnes per square kilometre 3.5 tonnes per square kilometre 15.26 tonnes per square kilometre Hong Kong
2020s 16.9 tonnes per square kilometre 3.1 tonnes per square kilometre 13.81 tonnes per square kilometre Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre, Hong Kong or South Korea?
Hong Kong, at 16.19 tonnes per square kilometre against 3.17 tonnes per square kilometre in South Korea as of 2023.
What is the difference in soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre between Hong Kong and South Korea?
13.02 tonnes per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and South Korea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong and South Korea rank globally for soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre?
Hong Kong ranks 2nd and South Korea ranks 3rd of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs South Korea: Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/soybeans-are-they-used-for-food-feed-or-fuel-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/soybeans-are-they-used-for-food-feed-or-fuel-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/korea-rep/">Hong Kong vs South Korea: Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 9,521 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel? divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.