El Salvador vs East Timor: Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre

El Salvador
0.2413 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor
0.2017 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
20th
East Timor rank
22nd

Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre over time

  • El Salvador
  • East Timor
00.050.10.150.20.25196119922023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 0.2413 tonnes per square kilometre against 0.2017 tonnes per square kilometre in East Timor, a difference of 0.0396 tonnes per square kilometre.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.2 times East Timor's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was East Timor ahead.

El Salvador ranks 20th and East Timor ranks 22nd of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 4 and East Timor in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador East Timor Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0053 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0672 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0619 tonnes per square kilometre East Timor
1970s 0.0193 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0672 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0479 tonnes per square kilometre East Timor
1980s 0.0531 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0672 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0142 tonnes per square kilometre East Timor
1990s 0.0965 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0672 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0293 tonnes per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 0.1979 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0672 tonnes per square kilometre 0.1306 tonnes per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 0.2413 tonnes per square kilometre 0.1076 tonnes per square kilometre 0.1337 tonnes per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 0.2413 tonnes per square kilometre 0.1513 tonnes per square kilometre 0.09 tonnes per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre, El Salvador or East Timor?
El Salvador, at 0.2413 tonnes per square kilometre against 0.2017 tonnes per square kilometre in East Timor as of 2023.
What is the difference in soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre between El Salvador and East Timor?
0.0396 tonnes per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and East Timor?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and East Timor rank globally for soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre?
El Salvador ranks 20th and East Timor ranks 22nd of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs East Timor: Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/soybeans-are-they-used-for-food-feed-or-fuel-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/soybeans-are-they-used-for-food-feed-or-fuel-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/timor-leste/">El Salvador vs East Timor: Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 9,521 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel? divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.