Cote d'Ivoire vs Sweden: Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre

Cote d'Ivoire
0.0031 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
0.0025 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Cote d'Ivoire rank
71st
Sweden rank
74th

Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Sweden
00.0050.010.015196119922023

How they compare

Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 0.0031 tonnes per square kilometre against 0.0025 tonnes per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 0.0006 tonnes per square kilometre.

That makes Cote d'Ivoire's figure about 1.3 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 71st and Sweden ranks 74th of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 3 and Sweden in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre
1970s 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre
1980s 0.0038 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0038 tonnes per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
1990s 0.0101 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0017 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0083 tonnes per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
2000s 0.0041 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0025 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0016 tonnes per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
2010s 0.0003 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0025 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0021 tonnes per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 0.0008 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0031 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0023 tonnes per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre, Cote d'Ivoire or Sweden?
Cote d'Ivoire, at 0.0031 tonnes per square kilometre against 0.0025 tonnes per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre between Cote d'Ivoire and Sweden?
0.0006 tonnes per square kilometre, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Sweden?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Sweden rank globally for soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 71st and Sweden ranks 74th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cote d'Ivoire vs Sweden: Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/soybeans-are-they-used-for-food-feed-or-fuel-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/soybeans-are-they-used-for-food-feed-or-fuel-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/sweden/">Cote d'Ivoire vs Sweden: Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 9,521 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel? divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.