Costa Rica vs Myanmar: Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre

Costa Rica
0.0392 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Myanmar
0.0414 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
41st
Myanmar rank
40th

Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Myanmar
00.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 0.0414 tonnes per square kilometre against 0.0392 tonnes per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.0022 tonnes per square kilometre.

That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Myanmar ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 41st and Myanmar ranks 40th of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 4 and Myanmar in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Myanmar Difference Ahead
1960s 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0014 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0014 tonnes per square kilometre Myanmar
1970s 0.002 tonnes per square kilometre 0.002 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre Myanmar
1980s 0.0294 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0035 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0259 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 0.1214 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0073 tonnes per square kilometre 0.1141 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 0.2487 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0246 tonnes per square kilometre 0.2241 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 0.0979 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0391 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0589 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 0.0392 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0437 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0045 tonnes per square kilometre Myanmar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre, Costa Rica or Myanmar?
Myanmar, at 0.0414 tonnes per square kilometre against 0.0392 tonnes per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre between Costa Rica and Myanmar?
0.0022 tonnes per square kilometre, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Myanmar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Myanmar rank globally for soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 41st and Myanmar ranks 40th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Myanmar: Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/soybeans-are-they-used-for-food-feed-or-fuel-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/soybeans-are-they-used-for-food-feed-or-fuel-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/myanmar/">Costa Rica vs Myanmar: Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 9,521 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel? divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.