Costa Rica vs Liberia: Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre

Costa Rica
0.0392 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Liberia
0.0311 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
41st
Liberia rank
42nd

Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Liberia
00.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 0.0392 tonnes per square kilometre against 0.0311 tonnes per square kilometre in Liberia, a difference of 0.0081 tonnes per square kilometre.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.3 times Liberia's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Liberia ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 41st and Liberia ranks 42nd of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 5 and Liberia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Liberia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0104 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0104 tonnes per square kilometre Liberia
1970s 0.002 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0104 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0084 tonnes per square kilometre Liberia
1980s 0.0294 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0197 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0097 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 0.1214 tonnes per square kilometre 0.027 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0944 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 0.2487 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0311 tonnes per square kilometre 0.2176 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 0.0979 tonnes per square kilometre 0.027 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0709 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 0.0392 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0311 tonnes per square kilometre 0.008 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre, Costa Rica or Liberia?
Costa Rica, at 0.0392 tonnes per square kilometre against 0.0311 tonnes per square kilometre in Liberia as of 2023.
What is the difference in soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre between Costa Rica and Liberia?
0.0081 tonnes per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Liberia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Liberia rank globally for soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 41st and Liberia ranks 42nd of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Liberia: Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/soybeans-are-they-used-for-food-feed-or-fuel-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/liberia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/soybeans-are-they-used-for-food-feed-or-fuel-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/liberia/">Costa Rica vs Liberia: Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 9,521 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel? divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.