North Macedonia vs Ukraine: Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?
North Macedonia
0 tonnes
in 2023
Ukraine
0 tonnes
in 2023
North Macedonia rank
84th
Ukraine rank
84th
Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel? over time
- North Macedonia
- Ukraine
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Ukraine, a difference of 0 tonnes.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was North Macedonia ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 84th and Ukraine ranks 84th of 190 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 500 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 500 tonnes | North Macedonia |
| 2000s | 700 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 700 tonnes | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 800 tonnes | 600 tonnes | 200 tonnes | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 250 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 250 tonnes | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, North Macedonia or Ukraine?
- North Macedonia, at 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Ukraine as of 2023.
- What is the difference in soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel? between North Macedonia and Ukraine?
- 0 tonnes, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Ukraine?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do North Macedonia and Ukraine rank globally for soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel??
- North Macedonia ranks 84th and Ukraine ranks 84th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is allocated for direct consumption as human food, rather than allocation to animal feed or industrial uses.