Nauru vs Serbia: Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?
Nauru
0 tonnes
in 2023
Serbia
0 tonnes
in 2023
Nauru rank
84th
Serbia rank
84th
Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel? over time
- Nauru
- Serbia
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Serbia, a difference of 0 tonnes.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Nauru ranks 84th and Serbia ranks 84th of 190 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 2020s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, Nauru or Serbia?
- Nauru, at 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel? between Nauru and Serbia?
- 0 tonnes, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Nauru and Serbia rank globally for soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel??
- Nauru ranks 84th and Serbia ranks 84th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is allocated for direct consumption as human food, rather than allocation to animal feed or industrial uses.