Macao vs Norway: Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?
Macao
1,000 tonnes
in 2023
Norway
1,000 tonnes
in 2023
Macao rank
65th
Norway rank
65th
Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel? over time
- Macao
- Norway
How they compare
Macao currently reports 1,000 tonnes against 1,000 tonnes in Norway, a difference of 0 tonnes.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.
Macao ranks 65th and Norway ranks 65th of 190 countries.
Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Macao | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 1970s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 1980s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 1990s | 700 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 700 tonnes | Macao |
| 2000s | 1,100 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 1,100 tonnes | Macao |
| 2010s | 1,100 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 1,100 tonnes | Macao |
| 2020s | 1,000 tonnes | 1,000 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, Macao or Norway?
- Macao, at 1,000 tonnes against 1,000 tonnes in Norway as of 2023.
- What is the difference in soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel? between Macao and Norway?
- 0 tonnes, with Macao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and Norway?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Macao and Norway rank globally for soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel??
- Macao ranks 65th and Norway ranks 65th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is allocated for direct consumption as human food, rather than allocation to animal feed or industrial uses.