Kiribati vs Nauru: Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?
Kiribati
0 tonnes
in 2023
Nauru
0 tonnes
in 2023
Kiribati rank
84th
Nauru rank
84th
Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel? over time
- Kiribati
- Nauru
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Nauru, a difference of 0 tonnes.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Nauru ahead.
Kiribati ranks 84th and Nauru ranks 84th of 190 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 2020s | 500 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 500 tonnes | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, Kiribati or Nauru?
- Kiribati, at 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Nauru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel? between Kiribati and Nauru?
- 0 tonnes, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Nauru?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Nauru rank globally for soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel??
- Kiribati ranks 84th and Nauru ranks 84th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is allocated for direct consumption as human food, rather than allocation to animal feed or industrial uses.