Kiribati vs Mongolia: Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?
Kiribati
0 tonnes
in 2023
Mongolia
0 tonnes
in 2023
Kiribati rank
85th
Mongolia rank
85th
Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel? over time
- Kiribati
- Mongolia
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Mongolia, a difference of 0 tonnes.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mongolia ahead.
Kiribati ranks 85th and Mongolia ranks 85th of 191 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 1970s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 1980s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 1990s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 2000s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 2010s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 2020s | 500 tonnes | 250 tonnes | 250 tonnes | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, Kiribati or Mongolia?
- Kiribati, at 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Mongolia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel? between Kiribati and Mongolia?
- 0 tonnes, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Mongolia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Mongolia rank globally for soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel??
- Kiribati ranks 85th and Mongolia ranks 85th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is allocated for direct consumption as human food, rather than allocation to animal feed or industrial uses.