Jamaica vs Mauritania: Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?
Jamaica
0 tonnes
in 2023
Mauritania
0 tonnes
in 2023
Jamaica rank
84th
Mauritania rank
84th
Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel? over time
- Jamaica
- Mauritania
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Mauritania, a difference of 0 tonnes.
Across all 62 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.
Jamaica ranks 84th and Mauritania ranks 84th of 190 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | β |
| 1970s | 0 tonnes | 100 tonnes | 100 tonnes | Mauritania |
| 1980s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | β |
| 1990s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | β |
| 2000s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | β |
| 2010s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | β |
| 2020s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, Jamaica or Mauritania?
- Jamaica, at 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Mauritania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel? between Jamaica and Mauritania?
- 0 tonnes, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Mauritania?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Jamaica and Mauritania rank globally for soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel??
- Jamaica ranks 84th and Mauritania ranks 84th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is allocated for direct consumption as human food, rather than allocation to animal feed or industrial uses.