Eswatini vs Guyana: Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?
Eswatini
0 tonnes
in 2023
Guyana
0 tonnes
in 2023
Eswatini rank
85th
Guyana rank
85th
Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel? over time
- Eswatini
- Guyana
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Guyana, a difference of 0 tonnes.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guyana ahead.
Eswatini ranks 85th and Guyana ranks 85th of 191 countries.
Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Guyana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 tonnes | 111.11 tonnes | 111.11 tonnes | Guyana |
| 1970s | 0 tonnes | 400 tonnes | 400 tonnes | Guyana |
| 1980s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 1990s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 2000s | 500 tonnes | 500 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 2010s | 100 tonnes | 1,100 tonnes | 1,000 tonnes | Guyana |
| 2020s | 0 tonnes | 500 tonnes | 500 tonnes | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, Eswatini or Guyana?
- Eswatini, at 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Guyana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel? between Eswatini and Guyana?
- 0 tonnes, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Guyana?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Guyana rank globally for soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel??
- Eswatini ranks 85th and Guyana ranks 85th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is allocated for direct consumption as human food, rather than allocation to animal feed or industrial uses.