Central African Republic vs Eswatini: Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?
Central African Republic
0 tonnes
in 2022
Eswatini
0 tonnes
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
84th
Eswatini rank
84th
Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel? over time
- Central African Republic
- Eswatini
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Eswatini, a difference of 0 tonnes.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 84th and Eswatini ranks 84th of 190 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 tonnes | 100 tonnes | 100 tonnes | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, Central African Republic or Eswatini?
- Central African Republic, at 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Eswatini as of 2022.
- What is the difference in soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel? between Central African Republic and Eswatini?
- 0 tonnes, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Eswatini?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Central African Republic and Eswatini rank globally for soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel??
- Central African Republic ranks 84th and Eswatini ranks 84th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is allocated for direct consumption as human food, rather than allocation to animal feed or industrial uses.