Brunei vs Guatemala: Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?
Brunei
1,000 tonnes
in 2009
Guatemala
1,000 tonnes
in 2023
Brunei rank
65th
Guatemala rank
65th
Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel? over time
- Brunei
- Guatemala
How they compare
Brunei currently reports 1,000 tonnes against 1,000 tonnes in Guatemala, a difference of 0 tonnes.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.
Brunei ranks 65th and Guatemala ranks 65th of 190 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Brunei averaged higher in 1 and Guatemala in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 1970s | 200 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 200 tonnes | Brunei |
| 1980s | 600 tonnes | 1,200 tonnes | 600 tonnes | Guatemala |
| 1990s | 400 tonnes | 4,200 tonnes | 3,800 tonnes | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 500 tonnes | 4,300 tonnes | 3,800 tonnes | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, Brunei or Guatemala?
- Brunei, at 1,000 tonnes against 1,000 tonnes in Guatemala as of 2009.
- What is the difference in soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel? between Brunei and Guatemala?
- 0 tonnes, with Brunei ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei and Guatemala?
- 49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2009.
- How do Brunei and Guatemala rank globally for soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel??
- Brunei ranks 65th and Guatemala ranks 65th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is allocated for direct consumption as human food, rather than allocation to animal feed or industrial uses.