Brazil vs North Macedonia: Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?
Brazil
0 tonnes
in 2023
North Macedonia
0 tonnes
in 2023
Brazil rank
84th
North Macedonia rank
84th
Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel? over time
- Brazil
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in North Macedonia, a difference of 0 tonnes.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 84th and North Macedonia ranks 84th of 190 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and North Macedonia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 383,625 tonnes | 500 tonnes | 383,125 tonnes | Brazil |
| 2000s | 557,700 tonnes | 700 tonnes | 557,000 tonnes | Brazil |
| 2010s | 0 tonnes | 800 tonnes | 800 tonnes | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 0 tonnes | 250 tonnes | 250 tonnes | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, Brazil or North Macedonia?
- Brazil, at 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in North Macedonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel? between Brazil and North Macedonia?
- 0 tonnes, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and North Macedonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and North Macedonia rank globally for soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel??
- Brazil ranks 84th and North Macedonia ranks 84th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is allocated for direct consumption as human food, rather than allocation to animal feed or industrial uses.