Brazil vs Gambia: Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?
Brazil
0 tonnes
in 2023
Gambia
0 tonnes
in 2023
Brazil rank
84th
Gambia rank
84th
Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel? over time
- Brazil
- Gambia
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Gambia, a difference of 0 tonnes.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 84th and Gambia ranks 84th of 190 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6,444 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 6,444 tonnes | Brazil |
| 1970s | 104,900 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 104,900 tonnes | Brazil |
| 1980s | 267,900 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 267,900 tonnes | Brazil |
| 1990s | 364,300 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 364,300 tonnes | Brazil |
| 2000s | 557,700 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 557,700 tonnes | Brazil |
| 2010s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 2020s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, Brazil or Gambia?
- Brazil, at 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Gambia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel? between Brazil and Gambia?
- 0 tonnes, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Gambia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and Gambia rank globally for soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel??
- Brazil ranks 84th and Gambia ranks 84th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is allocated for direct consumption as human food, rather than allocation to animal feed or industrial uses.