Bolivia vs Ethiopia: Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?
Bolivia
7,000 tonnes
in 2023
Ethiopia
8,000 tonnes
in 2023
Bolivia rank
37th
Ethiopia rank
35th
Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel? over time
- Bolivia
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 8,000 tonnes against 7,000 tonnes in Bolivia, a difference of 1,000 tonnes.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.1 times Bolivia's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Ethiopia has been ahead every year.
Bolivia ranks 37th and Ethiopia ranks 35th of 191 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 tonnes | 3,000 tonnes | 3,000 tonnes | Ethiopia |
| 2000s | 0 tonnes | 4,100 tonnes | 4,100 tonnes | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 700 tonnes | 41,200 tonnes | 40,500 tonnes | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 7,000 tonnes | 49,500 tonnes | 42,500 tonnes | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, Bolivia or Ethiopia?
- Ethiopia, at 8,000 tonnes against 7,000 tonnes in Bolivia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel? between Bolivia and Ethiopia?
- 1,000 tonnes, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Ethiopia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Bolivia and Ethiopia rank globally for soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel??
- Bolivia ranks 37th and Ethiopia ranks 35th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is allocated for direct consumption as human food, rather than allocation to animal feed or industrial uses.