Belarus vs Uganda: Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?
Belarus
0 tonnes
in 2023
Uganda
0 tonnes
in 2023
Belarus rank
85th
Uganda rank
85th
Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel? over time
- Belarus
- Uganda
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Uganda, a difference of 0 tonnes.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uganda ahead.
Belarus ranks 85th and Uganda ranks 85th of 191 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 125 tonnes | 8,625 tonnes | 8,500 tonnes | Uganda |
| 2000s | 600 tonnes | 23,500 tonnes | 22,900 tonnes | Uganda |
| 2010s | 4,800 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 4,800 tonnes | Belarus |
| 2020s | 4,000 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 4,000 tonnes | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?, Belarus or Uganda?
- Belarus, at 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Uganda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel? between Belarus and Uganda?
- 0 tonnes, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Uganda?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Uganda rank globally for soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel??
- Belarus ranks 85th and Uganda ranks 85th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Soybeans: are they used for food, feed or fuel?. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is allocated for direct consumption as human food, rather than allocation to animal feed or industrial uses.