China vs Mexico: Single commodity indicators — Excess feed cost
Single commodity indicators — Excess feed cost over time
- China
- Mexico
How they compare
China currently reports 535.35 Euro against 69.79 Euro in Mexico, a difference of 465.56 Euro.
That makes China's figure about 7.7 times Mexico's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was China ahead.
China ranks 1st and Mexico ranks 3rd of 18 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.61 Euro | 6.92 Euro | 0.6814 Euro | China |
| 2000s | 14.5 Euro | 5.85 Euro | 8.65 Euro | China |
| 2010s | 629.44 Euro | 16.06 Euro | 613.39 Euro | China |
| 2020s | 448.92 Euro | 26.09 Euro | 422.83 Euro | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher single commodity indicators — excess feed cost, China or Mexico?
- China, at 535.35 Euro against 69.79 Euro in Mexico as of 2024.
- What is the difference in single commodity indicators — excess feed cost between China and Mexico?
- 465.56 Euro, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Mexico?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do China and Mexico rank globally for single commodity indicators — excess feed cost?
- China ranks 1st and Mexico ranks 3rd of 18 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Single commodity indicators — Excess feed cost. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset is a complement to the report Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation 2025, which monitors agricultural policy developments in 38 OECD member countries, 5 non-OECD European Union member states and 11 emerging and developing economies: Argentina, Brazil, People’s Republic of China, India, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, the Philippines, the Russian Federation, South Africa, Ukraine and Viet Nam. This table presents the core indicators of commodity-level data. The commodities used in this dataset have been reviewed and mapped to the Central Product Classification (CPC) Version 2.1 where relevant to facilitate international comparison. The mapping can be found here