Japan vs United States: Single commodity indicators — Consumer Single Commodity Transfer
Single commodity indicators — Consumer Single Commodity Transfer over time
- Japan
- United States
How they compare
Japan currently reports 0 Euro against 0 Euro in United States, a difference of 0 Euro.
Across all 39 years both countries report, United States has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 3rd and United States ranks 1st of 18 countries.
United States has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | United States | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | -5,482 Euro | -266.17 Euro | 5,216 Euro | United States |
| 1990s | -5,598 Euro | -234.61 Euro | 5,363 Euro | United States |
| 2000s | -446.33 Euro | 0.761 Euro | 447.09 Euro | United States |
| 2010s | 0 Euro | 0 Euro | 0 Euro | — |
| 2020s | 0 Euro | 0 Euro | 0 Euro | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher single commodity indicators — consumer single commodity transfer, Japan or United States?
- Japan, at 0 Euro against 0 Euro in United States as of 2024.
- What is the difference in single commodity indicators — consumer single commodity transfer between Japan and United States?
- 0 Euro, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and United States?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2024.
- How do Japan and United States rank globally for single commodity indicators — consumer single commodity transfer?
- Japan ranks 3rd and United States ranks 1st of 18 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Single commodity indicators — Consumer Single Commodity Transfer (consumer SCT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset is a complement to the report Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation 2025, which monitors agricultural policy developments in 38 OECD member countries, 5 non-OECD European Union member states and 11 emerging and developing economies: Argentina, Brazil, People’s Republic of China, India, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, the Philippines, the Russian Federation, South Africa, Ukraine and Viet Nam. This table presents the core indicators of commodity-level data. The commodities used in this dataset have been reviewed and mapped to the Central Product Classification (CPC) Version 2.1 where relevant to facilitate international comparison. The mapping can be found here