Japan vs Ukraine: Single commodity indicators — Consumer Single Commodity Transfer
Single commodity indicators — Consumer Single Commodity Transfer over time
- Japan
- Ukraine
How they compare
Japan currently reports 0 Euro against 0 Euro in Ukraine, a difference of 0 Euro.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Ukraine has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 3rd and Ukraine ranks 3rd of 18 countries.
Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -5,872 Euro | 38.64 Euro | 5,911 Euro | Ukraine |
| 2000s | -446.33 Euro | 92.83 Euro | 539.16 Euro | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 0 Euro | 85.45 Euro | 85.45 Euro | Ukraine |
| 2020s | 0 Euro | 0 Euro | 0 Euro | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher single commodity indicators — consumer single commodity transfer, Japan or Ukraine?
- Japan, at 0 Euro against 0 Euro in Ukraine as of 2024.
- What is the difference in single commodity indicators — consumer single commodity transfer between Japan and Ukraine?
- 0 Euro, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Ukraine?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Japan and Ukraine rank globally for single commodity indicators — consumer single commodity transfer?
- Japan ranks 3rd and Ukraine ranks 3rd of 18 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Single commodity indicators — Consumer Single Commodity Transfer (consumer SCT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset is a complement to the report Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation 2025, which monitors agricultural policy developments in 38 OECD member countries, 5 non-OECD European Union member states and 11 emerging and developing economies: Argentina, Brazil, People’s Republic of China, India, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, the Philippines, the Russian Federation, South Africa, Ukraine and Viet Nam. This table presents the core indicators of commodity-level data. The commodities used in this dataset have been reviewed and mapped to the Central Product Classification (CPC) Version 2.1 where relevant to facilitate international comparison. The mapping can be found here