Lebanon vs New Zealand: Share of population not using improved sanitation facilities
Lebanon
0.0%
in 2024
New Zealand
0.0%
in 2024
Lebanon rank
186th
New Zealand rank
186th
Share of population not using improved sanitation facilities over time
- Lebanon
- New Zealand
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Lebanon ahead.
Lebanon ranks 186th and New Zealand ranks 186th of 232 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lebanon averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.8% | 0.0% | 18.8% | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 6.0% | 0.0% | 6.0% | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of population not using improved sanitation facilities, Lebanon or New Zealand?
- Lebanon, at 0.0% against 0.0% in New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in share of population not using improved sanitation facilities between Lebanon and New Zealand?
- 0.0%, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and New Zealand?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Lebanon and New Zealand rank globally for share of population not using improved sanitation facilities?
- Lebanon ranks 186th and New Zealand ranks 186th of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of population not using improved sanitation facilities. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
If no improved sanitation facility is available, people might practice open defecation or use unimproved sanitation facilities.