Brazil vs Wallis and Futuna: Share of population not using improved sanitation facilities
Brazil
7.5%
in 2024
Wallis and Futuna
7.0%
in 2024
Brazil rank
76th
Wallis and Futuna rank
79th
Share of population not using improved sanitation facilities over time
- Brazil
- Wallis and Futuna
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 7.5% against 7.0% in Wallis and Futuna, a difference of 0.5%.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Wallis and Futuna's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 76th and Wallis and Futuna ranks 79th of 232 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Wallis and Futuna | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.9% | 4.4% | 17.5% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 14.3% | 5.8% | 8.4% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 8.9% | 6.9% | 1.9% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of population not using improved sanitation facilities, Brazil or Wallis and Futuna?
- Brazil, at 7.5% against 7.0% in Wallis and Futuna as of 2024.
- What is the difference in share of population not using improved sanitation facilities between Brazil and Wallis and Futuna?
- 0.5%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Wallis and Futuna?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Wallis and Futuna rank globally for share of population not using improved sanitation facilities?
- Brazil ranks 76th and Wallis and Futuna ranks 79th of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of population not using improved sanitation facilities. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
If no improved sanitation facility is available, people might practice open defecation or use unimproved sanitation facilities.