Poland vs Tajikistan: Income share of the richest 1%: World Inequality Database vs. World Bank
Poland
12.8%
in 2022
Tajikistan
12.9%
in 2015
Poland rank
60th
Tajikistan rank
59th
Income share of the richest 1%: World Inequality Database vs. World Bank over time
- Poland
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 12.9% against 12.8% in Poland, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Poland ranks 60th and Tajikistan ranks 59th of 109 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Poland averaged higher in 1 and Tajikistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.9% | 11.6% | 2.7% | Tajikistan |
| 2000s | 11.2% | 14.1% | 2.9% | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 13.0% | 12.9% | 0.1% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher income share of the richest 1%: world inequality database vs. world bank, Poland or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 12.9% against 12.8% in Poland as of 2015.
- What is the difference in income share of the richest 1%: world inequality database vs. world bank between Poland and Tajikistan?
- 0.1%, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Tajikistan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2015.
- How do Poland and Tajikistan rank globally for income share of the richest 1%: world inequality database vs. world bank?
- Poland ranks 60th and Tajikistan ranks 59th of 109 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Inequality Database (WID.world) (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Income share of the richest 1%: World Inequality Database vs. World Bank. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The share of income received by the richest 1% of the population. Income here is measured after taxes and benefits.