Hong Kong vs East Timor: Share of potential polio cases tested and reported to the WHO
Hong Kong
0.0%
in 2023
East Timor
0.0%
in 2023
Hong Kong rank
117th
East Timor rank
117th
Share of potential polio cases tested and reported to the WHO over time
- Hong Kong
- East Timor
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in East Timor, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 117th and East Timor ranks 117th of 173 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 2 and East Timor in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.8% | 26.3% | 54.5% | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 65.6% | 44.6% | 21.0% | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 12.5% | 12.5% | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of potential polio cases tested and reported to the who, Hong Kong or East Timor?
- Hong Kong, at 0.0% against 0.0% in East Timor as of 2023.
- What is the difference in share of potential polio cases tested and reported to the who between Hong Kong and East Timor?
- 0.0%, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and East Timor?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
- How do Hong Kong and East Timor rank globally for share of potential polio cases tested and reported to the who?
- Hong Kong ranks 117th and East Timor ranks 117th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization (2024) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of potential polio cases tested and reported to the WHO. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Share of acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) cases, where stool samples were tested for poliovirus and reported to the WHO.