Nepal vs Oman: Share of e coli bloodstream infections due to antimicrobial resistant
Nepal
77.06
in 2022
Oman
78.16
in 2022
Nepal rank
5th
Oman rank
3rd
Share of e coli bloodstream infections due to antimicrobial resistant over time
- Nepal
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 78.16 against 77.06 in Nepal, a difference of 1.1.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Nepal ahead.
Nepal ranks 5th and Oman ranks 3rd of 46 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 71.3 | 53.48 | 17.82 | Nepal |
| 2020s | 76.81 | 73.66 | 3.14 | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of e coli bloodstream infections due to antimicrobial resistant, Nepal or Oman?
- Oman, at 78.16 against 77.06 in Nepal as of 2022.
- What is the difference in share of e coli bloodstream infections due to antimicrobial resistant between Nepal and Oman?
- 1.1, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Oman?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Nepal and Oman rank globally for share of e coli bloodstream infections due to antimicrobial resistant?
- Nepal ranks 5th and Oman ranks 3rd of 46 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Share of e coli bloodstream infections due to antimicrobial resistant bacteria. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.