United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland vs United States of America: Malnutrition: Share of children who are wasted

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
0.4%
in 2019
United States of America
0.1%
in 2022
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
96th
United States of America rank
99th

Malnutrition: Share of children who are wasted over time

  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
  • United States of America
00.250.50.7511.2199120062022

How they compare

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland currently reports 0.4% against 0.1% in United States of America, a difference of 0.3%.

That makes United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland's figure about 4.0 times United States of America's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2008 it was United States of America ahead.

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 96th and United States of America ranks 99th of 99 countries.

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United States of America Difference Ahead
2000s 0.6% 0.6% 0.0%
2010s 0.4% 0.2% 0.1% United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher malnutrition: share of children who are wasted, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland or United States of America?
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, at 0.4% against 0.1% in United States of America as of 2019.
What is the difference in malnutrition: share of children who are wasted between United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and United States of America?
0.3%, with United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and United States of America?
6 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2018.
How do United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and United States of America rank globally for malnutrition: share of children who are wasted?
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 96th and United States of America ranks 99th of 99 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Joint child Malnutrition Estimates (JME) - UNICEF, WHO, and World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Malnutrition: Share of children who are wasted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland vs United States of America: Malnutrition: Share of children who are wasted. Statizoid, drawing on Joint child Malnutrition Estimates (JME) - UNICEF, WHO, and World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-children-with-a-weight-too-low-for-their-height-wasting/united-kingdom/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-children-with-a-weight-too-low-for-their-height-wasting/united-kingdom/united-states/">United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland vs United States of America: Malnutrition: Share of children who are wasted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Malnutrition: Share of children who are wasted
Unit
% of children under 5
Source
Joint child Malnutrition Estimates (JME) - UNICEF, WHO, and World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
99 places, 962 data points, 1984–2024
Last refreshed

The share of children younger than five years old that are defined as "wasted". Wasting is when a child’s weight is significantly lower than the average for their height, for example, because of acute food shortage or disease.