Jamaica vs Russian Federation: Malnutrition: Share of children who are wasted
Jamaica
3.2%
in 2018
Russian Federation
3.3%
in 2005
Jamaica rank
62nd
Russian Federation rank
60th
Malnutrition: Share of children who are wasted over time
- Jamaica
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 3.3% against 3.2% in Jamaica, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Jamaica ahead.
Jamaica ranks 62nd and Russian Federation ranks 60th of 99 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.3% | 3.9% | 0.6% | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 3.3% | 4.0% | 0.7% | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher malnutrition: share of children who are wasted, Jamaica or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 3.3% against 3.2% in Jamaica as of 2005.
- What is the difference in malnutrition: share of children who are wasted between Jamaica and Russian Federation?
- 0.1%, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Russian Federation?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2004.
- How do Jamaica and Russian Federation rank globally for malnutrition: share of children who are wasted?
- Jamaica ranks 62nd and Russian Federation ranks 60th of 99 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Joint child Malnutrition Estimates (JME) - UNICEF, WHO, and World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Malnutrition: Share of children who are wasted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The share of children younger than five years old that are defined as "wasted". Wasting is when a child’s weight is significantly lower than the average for their height, for example, because of acute food shortage or disease.