Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Iceland: Share of arable land which is organic
Share of arable land which is organic over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Iceland
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0.22 percent against 0.18 percent in Iceland, a difference of 0.04 percent.
That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.2 times Iceland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Iceland ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 122nd and Iceland ranks 125th of 172 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.028 percent | 0.32 percent | 0.292 percent | Iceland |
| 2010s | 0.036 percent | 0.465 percent | 0.429 percent | Iceland |
| 2020s | 0.1575 percent | 0.2575 percent | 0.1 percent | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of arable land which is organic, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Iceland?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0.22 percent against 0.18 percent in Iceland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in share of arable land which is organic between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iceland?
- 0.04 percent, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iceland?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iceland rank globally for share of arable land which is organic?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 122nd and Iceland ranks 125th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Share of arable land which is organic. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Organic arable land area is the sum of the area certified as organic by official standards, and land area in the conversion process to organic (which is assumed by the UN FAO as a two-year period prior to certification). Arable land is that used for crops (which does not include grazing land).