Guinea-Bissau vs Togo: Share of the population defined as severely food insecure vs. undernourished
Guinea-Bissau
9 percent
in 2022
Togo
9.9 percent
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
41st
Togo rank
38th
Share of the population defined as severely food insecure vs. undernourished over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 9.9 percent against 9 percent in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.9 percent.
That makes Togo's figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Togo has been ahead every year.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 41st and Togo ranks 38th of 125 countries.
Togo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 8.37 percent | 15.07 percent | 6.7 percent | Togo |
| 2020s | 8.87 percent | 12.4 percent | 3.53 percent | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of the population defined as severely food insecure vs. undernourished, Guinea-Bissau or Togo?
- Togo, at 9.9 percent against 9 percent in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
- What is the difference in share of the population defined as severely food insecure vs. undernourished between Guinea-Bissau and Togo?
- 0.9 percent, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Togo?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2022.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Togo rank globally for share of the population defined as severely food insecure vs. undernourished?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 41st and Togo ranks 38th of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Share of the population defined as severely food insecure vs. undernourished. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Both metrics indicate that someone does not get enough food (in terms of calories) to eat: these metrics should be strongly correlated. Severe food insecurity is measured based on food security questionnaires among households. Undernourishment is based on estimates of actual calorie intake across the population.