Central African Republic vs Mexico: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per unit of GDP

Central African Republic
0 metric tons per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Mexico
0 metric tons per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Central African Republic rank
78th
Mexico rank
77th

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per unit of GDP over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Mexico
000000196019922024

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP against 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP in Central African Republic, a difference of 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Mexico ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 78th and Mexico ranks 77th of 210 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 2 and Mexico in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP Mexico
1970s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP Mexico
1980s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP Central African Republic
1990s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP Central African Republic
2000s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP Mexico
2010s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP Mexico
2020s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per unit of gdp, Central African Republic or Mexico?
Mexico, at 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP against 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP in Central African Republic as of 2024.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per unit of gdp between Central African Republic and Mexico?
0 metric tons per US$ of GDP, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Mexico?
65 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
How do Central African Republic and Mexico rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per unit of gdp?
Central African Republic ranks 78th and Mexico ranks 77th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Mexico: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-unit-of-gdp/central-african-republic/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-unit-of-gdp/central-african-republic/mexico/">Central African Republic vs Mexico: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per unit of GDP
Unit
metric tons per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 11,336 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.