Palestine vs Zambia: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Palestine
0.1047 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.1097 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Palestine rank
74th
Zambia rank
73rd

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Palestine
  • Zambia
00.0250.050.0750.10.125196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.1097 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1047 metric tons per square kilometre in Palestine, a difference of 0.005 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zambia ahead.

Palestine ranks 74th and Zambia ranks 73rd of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Palestine averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Palestine Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1970s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0052 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0052 metric tons per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 0.0041 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0072 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0031 metric tons per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 0.0601 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0279 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0323 metric tons per square kilometre Palestine
2020s 0.1141 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0895 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0246 metric tons per square kilometre Palestine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Palestine or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.1097 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1047 metric tons per square kilometre in Palestine as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Palestine and Zambia?
0.005 metric tons per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Palestine and Zambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Palestine and Zambia rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Palestine ranks 74th and Zambia ranks 73rd of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Palestine vs Zambia: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/west-bank-and-gaza/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/west-bank-and-gaza/zambia/">Palestine vs Zambia: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.