Senegal vs Zimbabwe: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Senegal
0.0197 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0185 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Senegal rank
133rd
Zimbabwe rank
134th

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Senegal
  • Zimbabwe
00.020.040.06196119922023

How they compare

Senegal currently reports 0.0197 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0185 metric tons per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0012 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Senegal's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Senegal ranks 133rd and Zimbabwe ranks 134th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Senegal averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Senegal Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1970s 0.0006 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0006 metric tons per square kilometre Senegal
1980s 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0004 metric tons per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0004 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0079 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0075 metric tons per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0046 metric tons per square kilometre 0.046 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0414 metric tons per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0102 metric tons per square kilometre 0.026 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0158 metric tons per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Senegal or Zimbabwe?
Senegal, at 0.0197 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0185 metric tons per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Senegal and Zimbabwe?
0.0012 metric tons per square kilometre, with Senegal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Senegal and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Senegal and Zimbabwe rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Senegal ranks 133rd and Zimbabwe ranks 134th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Senegal vs Zimbabwe: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/senegal/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/senegal/zimbabwe/">Senegal vs Zimbabwe: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.