Rwanda vs Saint Lucia: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Rwanda
0.3041 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Lucia
0.2579 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda rank
54th
Saint Lucia rank
56th

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Rwanda
  • Saint Lucia
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.3041 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2579 metric tons per square kilometre in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.0462 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Saint Lucia's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Lucia ahead.

Rwanda ranks 54th and Saint Lucia ranks 56th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 2 and Saint Lucia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1970s 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 0.0016 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0615 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0598 metric tons per square kilometre Saint Lucia
1990s 0.0045 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0469 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0424 metric tons per square kilometre Saint Lucia
2000s 0.0121 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0215 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0094 metric tons per square kilometre Saint Lucia
2010s 0.071 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0683 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0027 metric tons per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 0.2497 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2743 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0247 metric tons per square kilometre Saint Lucia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Rwanda or Saint Lucia?
Rwanda, at 0.3041 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2579 metric tons per square kilometre in Saint Lucia as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Rwanda and Saint Lucia?
0.0462 metric tons per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Saint Lucia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Saint Lucia rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Rwanda ranks 54th and Saint Lucia ranks 56th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Saint Lucia: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/st-lucia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/st-lucia/">Rwanda vs Saint Lucia: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.