Nigeria vs Rwanda: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Nigeria
0.2842 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
0.3041 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Nigeria rank
55th
Rwanda rank
54th

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Nigeria
  • Rwanda
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.3041 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2842 metric tons per square kilometre in Nigeria, a difference of 0.0199 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Nigeria's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nigeria ahead.

Nigeria ranks 55th and Rwanda ranks 54th of 215 countries.

Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nigeria Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0032 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0032 metric tons per square kilometre Nigeria
1970s 0.0052 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0051 metric tons per square kilometre Nigeria
1980s 0.0097 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0016 metric tons per square kilometre 0.008 metric tons per square kilometre Nigeria
1990s 0.0192 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0045 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0147 metric tons per square kilometre Nigeria
2000s 0.0744 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0121 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0623 metric tons per square kilometre Nigeria
2010s 0.3039 metric tons per square kilometre 0.071 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2329 metric tons per square kilometre Nigeria
2020s 0.2897 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2497 metric tons per square kilometre 0.04 metric tons per square kilometre Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Nigeria or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 0.3041 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2842 metric tons per square kilometre in Nigeria as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Nigeria and Rwanda?
0.0199 metric tons per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Nigeria and Rwanda rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Nigeria ranks 55th and Rwanda ranks 54th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nigeria vs Rwanda: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/nigeria/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/nigeria/rwanda/">Nigeria vs Rwanda: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.