Mexico vs Tunisia: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Mexico
0.1445 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
0.137 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico rank
67th
Tunisia rank
70th

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Mexico
  • Tunisia
00.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 0.1445 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.137 metric tons per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0075 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Mexico's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mexico ahead.

Mexico ranks 67th and Tunisia ranks 70th of 215 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre Mexico
1970s 0.0013 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0013 metric tons per square kilometre Mexico
1980s 0.0068 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0019 metric tons per square kilometre 0.005 metric tons per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 0.0164 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0075 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0089 metric tons per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 0.0585 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0177 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0408 metric tons per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 0.0998 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0928 metric tons per square kilometre 0.007 metric tons per square kilometre Mexico
2020s 0.1503 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1479 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0024 metric tons per square kilometre Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Mexico or Tunisia?
Mexico, at 0.1445 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.137 metric tons per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Mexico and Tunisia?
0.0075 metric tons per square kilometre, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Tunisia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mexico and Tunisia rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Mexico ranks 67th and Tunisia ranks 70th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Tunisia: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/mexico/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/mexico/tunisia/">Mexico vs Tunisia: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.