Mexico vs Nicaragua: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Mexico
0.1445 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua
0.1591 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico rank
67th
Nicaragua rank
65th

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Mexico
  • Nicaragua
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 0.1591 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1445 metric tons per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 0.0146 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mexico ahead.

Mexico ranks 67th and Nicaragua ranks 65th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 4 and Nicaragua in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre Mexico
1970s 0.0013 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0013 metric tons per square kilometre Mexico
1980s 0.0068 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0066 metric tons per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 0.0164 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0157 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 0.0585 metric tons per square kilometre 0.083 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0246 metric tons per square kilometre Nicaragua
2010s 0.0998 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2025 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1027 metric tons per square kilometre Nicaragua
2020s 0.1503 metric tons per square kilometre 0.231 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0807 metric tons per square kilometre Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Mexico or Nicaragua?
Nicaragua, at 0.1591 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1445 metric tons per square kilometre in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Mexico and Nicaragua?
0.0146 metric tons per square kilometre, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Nicaragua?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mexico and Nicaragua rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Mexico ranks 67th and Nicaragua ranks 65th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Nicaragua: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/mexico/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/mexico/nicaragua/">Mexico vs Nicaragua: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.