Malawi vs Romania: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Malawi
0.0507 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania
0.049 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
104th
Romania rank
106th

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Malawi
  • Romania
00.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 0.0507 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.049 metric tons per square kilometre in Romania, a difference of 0.0017 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.

Malawi ranks 104th and Romania ranks 106th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0634 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0634 metric tons per square kilometre Romania
1970s 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1327 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1326 metric tons per square kilometre Romania
1980s 0.0016 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1836 metric tons per square kilometre 0.182 metric tons per square kilometre Romania
1990s 0.0028 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0846 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0818 metric tons per square kilometre Romania
2000s 0.0109 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0428 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0319 metric tons per square kilometre Romania
2010s 0.0629 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0477 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0152 metric tons per square kilometre Malawi
2020s 0.0829 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0506 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0323 metric tons per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Malawi or Romania?
Malawi, at 0.0507 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.049 metric tons per square kilometre in Romania as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Malawi and Romania?
0.0017 metric tons per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Romania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Romania rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Malawi ranks 104th and Romania ranks 106th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Romania: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/malawi/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/malawi/romania/">Malawi vs Romania: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.