Lesotho vs Saudi Arabia: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Lesotho
0.0663 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Saudi Arabia
0.0652 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Lesotho rank
93rd
Saudi Arabia rank
95th

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Lesotho
  • Saudi Arabia
00.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 0.0663 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0652 metric tons per square kilometre in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.0011 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

Lesotho ranks 93rd and Saudi Arabia ranks 95th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 4 and Saudi Arabia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1970s 0.0004 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0004 metric tons per square kilometre Lesotho
1980s 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0006 metric tons per square kilometre Lesotho
1990s 0.0005 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0015 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0011 metric tons per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2000s 0.0012 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0066 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0054 metric tons per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2010s 0.0373 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0168 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0205 metric tons per square kilometre Lesotho
2020s 0.0655 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0552 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0104 metric tons per square kilometre Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Lesotho or Saudi Arabia?
Lesotho, at 0.0663 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0652 metric tons per square kilometre in Saudi Arabia as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Lesotho and Saudi Arabia?
0.0011 metric tons per square kilometre, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Saudi Arabia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Lesotho and Saudi Arabia rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Lesotho ranks 93rd and Saudi Arabia ranks 95th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lesotho vs Saudi Arabia: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/lesotho/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/lesotho/saudi-arabia/">Lesotho vs Saudi Arabia: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.