Kiribati vs Tuvalu: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Kiribati
0.0099 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Tuvalu
0.0083 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati rank
149th
Tuvalu rank
152nd

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Kiribati
  • Tuvalu
051015196119922023

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 0.0099 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0083 metric tons per square kilometre in Tuvalu, a difference of 0.0016 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.2 times Tuvalu's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tuvalu ahead.

Kiribati ranks 149th and Tuvalu ranks 152nd of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 4 and Tuvalu in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1970s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1980s 0.4417 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4417 metric tons per square kilometre Kiribati
1990s 7.31 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 7.31 metric tons per square kilometre Kiribati
2000s 6.23 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0383 metric tons per square kilometre 6.19 metric tons per square kilometre Kiribati
2010s 3.73 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0593 metric tons per square kilometre 3.67 metric tons per square kilometre Kiribati
2020s 0.0068 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0071 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre Tuvalu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Kiribati or Tuvalu?
Kiribati, at 0.0099 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0083 metric tons per square kilometre in Tuvalu as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Kiribati and Tuvalu?
0.0016 metric tons per square kilometre, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Tuvalu?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Kiribati and Tuvalu rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Kiribati ranks 149th and Tuvalu ranks 152nd of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Tuvalu: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/tuvalu/">Kiribati vs Tuvalu: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.