Israel vs Turkey: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Israel
0.6701 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Turkey
0.7228 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Israel rank
31st
Turkey rank
30th

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Israel
  • Turkey
00.250.50.751196119922023

How they compare

Turkey currently reports 0.7228 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.6701 metric tons per square kilometre in Israel, a difference of 0.0527 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Turkey's figure about 1.1 times Israel's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Israel ahead.

Israel ranks 31st and Turkey ranks 30th of 215 countries.

Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel Turkey Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4979 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4977 metric tons per square kilometre Israel
1970s 0.6041 metric tons per square kilometre 0.001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6031 metric tons per square kilometre Israel
1980s 0.5797 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0034 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5763 metric tons per square kilometre Israel
1990s 0.7388 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0352 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7035 metric tons per square kilometre Israel
2000s 0.9792 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1408 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8384 metric tons per square kilometre Israel
2010s 0.8964 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3244 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5721 metric tons per square kilometre Israel
2020s 0.6758 metric tons per square kilometre 0.638 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0377 metric tons per square kilometre Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Israel or Turkey?
Turkey, at 0.7228 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.6701 metric tons per square kilometre in Israel as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Israel and Turkey?
0.0527 metric tons per square kilometre, with Turkey ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Turkey?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Israel and Turkey rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Israel ranks 31st and Turkey ranks 30th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Turkey: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/israel/turkiye/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/israel/turkiye/">Israel vs Turkey: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.