Isle of Man vs Oman: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Isle of Man
0.014 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Oman
0.0165 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Isle of Man rank
143rd
Oman rank
140th

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Isle of Man
  • Oman
00.010.020.03196119922023

How they compare

Oman currently reports 0.0165 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.014 metric tons per square kilometre in Isle of Man, a difference of 0.0025 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Oman's figure about 1.2 times Isle of Man's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Oman ahead.

Isle of Man ranks 143rd and Oman ranks 140th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Isle of Man averaged higher in 3 and Oman in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Isle of Man Oman Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1970s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1980s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1990s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre Oman
2000s 0.0132 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0005 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0127 metric tons per square kilometre Isle of Man
2010s 0.0263 metric tons per square kilometre 0.001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0254 metric tons per square kilometre Isle of Man
2020s 0.0202 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0093 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0108 metric tons per square kilometre Isle of Man

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Isle of Man or Oman?
Oman, at 0.0165 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.014 metric tons per square kilometre in Isle of Man as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Isle of Man and Oman?
0.0025 metric tons per square kilometre, with Oman ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Isle of Man and Oman?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Isle of Man and Oman rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Isle of Man ranks 143rd and Oman ranks 140th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Isle of Man vs Oman: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/isle-of-man/oman/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/isle-of-man/oman/">Isle of Man vs Oman: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.