Hong Kong vs Thailand: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Hong Kong
1.96 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Thailand
1.96 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong rank
16th
Thailand rank
17th

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Thailand
02.557.510196119922023

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 1.96 metric tons per square kilometre against 1.96 metric tons per square kilometre in Thailand, a difference of 0 metric tons per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong ranks 16th and Thailand ranks 17th of 215 countries.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Thailand Difference Ahead
1960s 1.2 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0974 metric tons per square kilometre 1.1 metric tons per square kilometre Hong Kong
1970s 4.85 metric tons per square kilometre 0.18 metric tons per square kilometre 4.67 metric tons per square kilometre Hong Kong
1980s 9.05 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2786 metric tons per square kilometre 8.77 metric tons per square kilometre Hong Kong
1990s 8.5 metric tons per square kilometre 0.9644 metric tons per square kilometre 7.53 metric tons per square kilometre Hong Kong
2000s 4.45 metric tons per square kilometre 2.27 metric tons per square kilometre 2.18 metric tons per square kilometre Hong Kong
2010s 3.79 metric tons per square kilometre 2.02 metric tons per square kilometre 1.77 metric tons per square kilometre Hong Kong
2020s 3.16 metric tons per square kilometre 1.96 metric tons per square kilometre 1.2 metric tons per square kilometre Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Hong Kong or Thailand?
Hong Kong, at 1.96 metric tons per square kilometre against 1.96 metric tons per square kilometre in Thailand as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Hong Kong and Thailand?
0 metric tons per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Thailand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong and Thailand rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Hong Kong ranks 16th and Thailand ranks 17th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Thailand: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/thailand/">Hong Kong vs Thailand: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.