Honduras vs Sri Lanka: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Honduras
0.9185 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
0.9843 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Honduras rank
26th
Sri Lanka rank
25th

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Honduras
  • Sri Lanka
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 0.9843 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.9185 metric tons per square kilometre in Honduras, a difference of 0.0658 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Honduras's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Honduras ranks 26th and Sri Lanka ranks 25th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 4 and Sri Lanka in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Honduras Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1970s 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 0.0098 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0046 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0051 metric tons per square kilometre Honduras
1990s 0.0666 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0501 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0165 metric tons per square kilometre Honduras
2000s 0.2915 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0819 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2096 metric tons per square kilometre Honduras
2010s 0.4932 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4096 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0836 metric tons per square kilometre Honduras
2020s 0.6935 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8611 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1676 metric tons per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Honduras or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 0.9843 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.9185 metric tons per square kilometre in Honduras as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Honduras and Sri Lanka?
0.0658 metric tons per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Sri Lanka?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Honduras and Sri Lanka rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Honduras ranks 26th and Sri Lanka ranks 25th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Honduras vs Sri Lanka: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/honduras/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/honduras/sri-lanka/">Honduras vs Sri Lanka: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.