Honduras vs Mauritius: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Honduras
0.9185 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
1.18 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Honduras rank
26th
Mauritius rank
23rd

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Honduras
  • Mauritius
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 1.18 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.9185 metric tons per square kilometre in Honduras, a difference of 0.2615 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.3 times Honduras's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Honduras ranks 26th and Mauritius ranks 23rd of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Honduras Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1970s 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0009 metric tons per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 0.0098 metric tons per square kilometre 0.023 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0133 metric tons per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 0.0666 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0563 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0103 metric tons per square kilometre Honduras
2000s 0.2915 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1126 metric tons per square kilometre 0.179 metric tons per square kilometre Honduras
2010s 0.4932 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5585 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0654 metric tons per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 0.6935 metric tons per square kilometre 1.19 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4975 metric tons per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Honduras or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 1.18 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.9185 metric tons per square kilometre in Honduras as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Honduras and Mauritius?
0.2615 metric tons per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Mauritius?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Honduras and Mauritius rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Honduras ranks 26th and Mauritius ranks 23rd of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Honduras vs Mauritius: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/honduras/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/honduras/mauritius/">Honduras vs Mauritius: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.