Haiti vs Mozambique: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Haiti
0.0106 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique
0.0099 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Haiti rank
147th
Mozambique rank
148th

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Haiti
  • Mozambique
00.0050.010.0150.02196119922023

How they compare

Haiti currently reports 0.0106 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0099 metric tons per square kilometre in Mozambique, a difference of 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Haiti's figure about 1.1 times Mozambique's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mozambique ahead.

Haiti ranks 147th and Mozambique ranks 148th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Haiti averaged higher in 3 and Mozambique in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Haiti Mozambique Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1970s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1980s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre Mozambique
1990s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre Mozambique
2000s 0.0027 metric tons per square kilometre 0.002 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre Haiti
2010s 0.02 metric tons per square kilometre 0.002 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0181 metric tons per square kilometre Haiti
2020s 0.0125 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0067 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0058 metric tons per square kilometre Haiti

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Haiti or Mozambique?
Haiti, at 0.0106 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0099 metric tons per square kilometre in Mozambique as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Haiti and Mozambique?
0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre, with Haiti ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Mozambique?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Haiti and Mozambique rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Haiti ranks 147th and Mozambique ranks 148th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Haiti vs Mozambique: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/haiti/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/haiti/mozambique/">Haiti vs Mozambique: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.