Germany vs Zambia: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Germany
0.1001 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.1097 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Germany rank
76th
Zambia rank
73rd

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Germany
  • Zambia
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.1097 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1001 metric tons per square kilometre in Germany, a difference of 0.0096 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Germany's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Germany ahead.

Germany ranks 76th and Zambia ranks 73rd of 215 countries.

Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Germany Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0486 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0486 metric tons per square kilometre Germany
1970s 0.0904 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0903 metric tons per square kilometre Germany
1980s 0.1812 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1805 metric tons per square kilometre Germany
1990s 0.2061 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0052 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2009 metric tons per square kilometre Germany
2000s 0.1458 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0072 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1386 metric tons per square kilometre Germany
2010s 0.0975 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0279 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0696 metric tons per square kilometre Germany
2020s 0.0905 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0895 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0009 metric tons per square kilometre Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Germany or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.1097 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1001 metric tons per square kilometre in Germany as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Germany and Zambia?
0.0096 metric tons per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Zambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Germany and Zambia rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Germany ranks 76th and Zambia ranks 73rd of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Germany vs Zambia: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/germany/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/germany/zambia/">Germany vs Zambia: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.