Germany vs Lebanon: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Germany
0.1001 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Lebanon
0.0966 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Germany rank
76th
Lebanon rank
78th

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Germany
  • Lebanon
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Germany currently reports 0.1001 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0966 metric tons per square kilometre in Lebanon, a difference of 0.0035 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Germany ahead.

Germany ranks 76th and Lebanon ranks 78th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Germany averaged higher in 5 and Lebanon in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Germany Lebanon Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0486 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0486 metric tons per square kilometre Germany
1970s 0.0904 metric tons per square kilometre 0.001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0894 metric tons per square kilometre Germany
1980s 0.1812 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0176 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1635 metric tons per square kilometre Germany
1990s 0.2061 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0227 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1834 metric tons per square kilometre Germany
2000s 0.1458 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0741 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0717 metric tons per square kilometre Germany
2010s 0.0975 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1079 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0105 metric tons per square kilometre Lebanon
2020s 0.0905 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0927 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0023 metric tons per square kilometre Lebanon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Germany or Lebanon?
Germany, at 0.1001 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0966 metric tons per square kilometre in Lebanon as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Germany and Lebanon?
0.0035 metric tons per square kilometre, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Lebanon?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Germany and Lebanon rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Germany ranks 76th and Lebanon ranks 78th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Germany vs Lebanon: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/germany/lebanon/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/germany/lebanon/">Germany vs Lebanon: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.