Gambia vs Morocco: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square

Gambia
0.0056 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Morocco
0.0053 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia rank
163rd
Morocco rank
164th

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square over time

  • Gambia
  • Morocco
00.0020.0040.0060.008196119922023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 0.0056 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0053 metric tons per square kilometre in Morocco, a difference of 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Gambia's figure about 1.1 times Morocco's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Morocco ahead.

Gambia ranks 163rd and Morocco ranks 164th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 3 and Morocco in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Morocco Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre Morocco
1970s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre Morocco
1980s 0.0005 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre Gambia
1990s 0.0008 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0036 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0028 metric tons per square kilometre Morocco
2000s 0.0018 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0033 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0014 metric tons per square kilometre Morocco
2010s 0.0045 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0024 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0022 metric tons per square kilometre Gambia
2020s 0.0056 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0047 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0008 metric tons per square kilometre Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square, Gambia or Morocco?
Gambia, at 0.0056 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0053 metric tons per square kilometre in Morocco as of 2023.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square between Gambia and Morocco?
0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Morocco?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Gambia and Morocco rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
Gambia ranks 163rd and Morocco ranks 164th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Morocco: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/morocco/">Gambia vs Morocco: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,245 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.